<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Surprise! The Plamegate Leaker was a Bush Opponent.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/08/30/surprise-the-plamegate-leaker-was-a-bush-opponent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/08/30/surprise-the-plamegate-leaker-was-a-bush-opponent/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 22:10:31 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/08/30/surprise-the-plamegate-leaker-was-a-bush-opponent/comment-page-1/#comment-283963</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:54:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2679#comment-283963</guid> <description>You could be right, Capt. Codger, but I&quot;m not sure.
The reason, I believe, that the special counsel was appointed is because of the leaked George Tenet letter. As I recall the timeline, Tenet&#039;s letter, which was leaked to the MSM, triggered the &quot;How Dare They!&quot; reflex from the Congressional Democrats, which then demanded, and got, a special counsel.
I, personally, would have dumped the whole load on them right then and there, but the President didn&#039;t have the whtire story, as key people not exactly friendly to him decided to withold pertinent information from him. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could be right, Capt. Codger, but I&quot;m not sure.</p><p>The reason, I believe, that the special counsel was appointed is because of the leaked George Tenet letter. As I recall the timeline, Tenet&#039;s letter, which was leaked to the MSM, triggered the &quot;How Dare They!&quot; reflex from the Congressional Democrats, which then demanded, and got, a special counsel.</p><p>I, personally, would have dumped the whole load on them right then and there, but the President didn&#039;t have the whtire story, as key people not exactly friendly to him decided to withold pertinent information from him.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Right Nation</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/08/30/surprise-the-plamegate-leaker-was-a-bush-opponent/comment-page-1/#comment-283943</link> <dc:creator>The Right Nation</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:31:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2679#comment-283943</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;PlameFlop...&lt;/strong&gt;Christian Rocca, su Il Foglio di oggi, racconta agli italiani (che non hanno avuto modo di leggerla da nessun&#039;altra parte) la patetica conclusione del &quot;Plamegate&quot;, lo scandalo che - nei sogni bagnati dei liberal di tutto il pianeta - avrebbe dovuto ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PlameFlop&#8230;</strong></p><p>Christian Rocca, su Il Foglio di oggi, racconta agli italiani (che non hanno avuto modo di leggerla da nessun&#8217;altra parte) la patetica conclusione del &#8220;Plamegate&#8221;, lo scandalo che &#8211; nei sogni bagnati dei liberal di tutto il pianeta &#8211; avrebbe dovuto &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/08/30/surprise-the-plamegate-leaker-was-a-bush-opponent/comment-page-1/#comment-283938</link> <dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:31:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2679#comment-283938</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Ex-State Dept. Official Revealed Plame...&lt;/strong&gt;Former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage told columnist Robert Novak the identity of underc...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ex-State Dept. Official Revealed Plame&#8230;</strong></p><p>Former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage told columnist Robert Novak the identity of underc&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Capt. Codger</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/08/30/surprise-the-plamegate-leaker-was-a-bush-opponent/comment-page-1/#comment-283944</link> <dc:creator>Capt. Codger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:45:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2679#comment-283944</guid> <description>Your analysis of the relationship between DOS and the WH is spot on.
But, there is a problem.
As we already know, the DOJ was informed of Armitage&#039;s leaks PRIOR to the appointment of Fitzgerald by then AJ John Ashcroft. Armitage was interviewed by the FBI about his leaks prior to the appointment of Fitzgerald.
Ashcroft was and is a strict Bush loyalist. So, if Armitage was indeed the leaker, why appoint a special counsel?
Something else is going on here. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your analysis of the relationship between DOS and the WH is spot on.</p><p>But, there is a problem.</p><p>As we already know, the DOJ was informed of Armitage&#039;s leaks PRIOR to the appointment of Fitzgerald by then AJ John Ashcroft. Armitage was interviewed by the FBI about his leaks prior to the appointment of Fitzgerald.</p><p>Ashcroft was and is a strict Bush loyalist. So, if Armitage was indeed the leaker, why appoint a special counsel?</p><p>Something else is going on here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Miss Carnivorous</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/08/30/surprise-the-plamegate-leaker-was-a-bush-opponent/comment-page-1/#comment-283940</link> <dc:creator>Miss Carnivorous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:37:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2679#comment-283940</guid> <description>Anyway isn&#039;t Armitage notorious for leaking classified information? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyway isn&#039;t Armitage notorious for leaking classified information?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Miss Carnivorous</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/08/30/surprise-the-plamegate-leaker-was-a-bush-opponent/comment-page-1/#comment-283939</link> <dc:creator>Miss Carnivorous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:36:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2679#comment-283939</guid> <description>Oh! My! Gawd! And they claim Karl Rove is a mastermind! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh! My! Gawd! And they claim Karl Rove is a mastermind!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-23 00:46:53 by W3 Total Cache -->
