<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Coulter Redux</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/06/18/coulter-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/06/18/coulter-redux/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:51:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Miss Carnivorous</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/06/18/coulter-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-233322</link> <dc:creator>Miss Carnivorous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 15:55:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2490#comment-233322</guid> <description>I read the book and it is exactly as Jimmie, describes. You do not have to read it, at all.  We say the same stuff she says, but we don&#039;t drag it out for a couple hundred pages.  It&#039;s just self congratulations for Cons, stroking ourselves, so to speak.  Liberals bad, Cons good. We know already, that&#039;s why we are Conservative. The material in her books is always the same. She is great in short doses, but doesn&#039;t have enough material for a book. She should stick to columns. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the book and it is exactly as Jimmie, describes. You do not have to read it, at all.  We say the same stuff she says, but we don&#039;t drag it out for a couple hundred pages.  It&#039;s just self congratulations for Cons, stroking ourselves, so to speak.  Liberals bad, Cons good. We know already, that&#039;s why we are Conservative. The material in her books is always the same. She is great in short doses, but doesn&#039;t have enough material for a book. She should stick to columns.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/06/18/coulter-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-233315</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 13:06:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2490#comment-233315</guid> <description>No, I haven&#039;t, Donovan. Right now I&#039;m not entirely sure that I will. I&#039;m prety familia with her argument and it seems as if she&#039;s basically expanding one aspect of her &quot;liberals are bad&quot; theme, like she did with the last couple of books.
Actually, I&#039;m kind of keen to get my hand on the Ramesh Ponnuru book, &quot;Party of Death&quot;. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I haven&#039;t, Donovan. Right now I&#039;m not entirely sure that I will. I&#039;m prety familia with her argument and it seems as if she&#039;s basically expanding one aspect of her &quot;liberals are bad&quot; theme, like she did with the last couple of books.</p><p>Actually, I&#039;m kind of keen to get my hand on the Ramesh Ponnuru book, &quot;Party of Death&quot;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Donovan Taylor</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/06/18/coulter-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-233314</link> <dc:creator>Donovan Taylor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:14:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2490#comment-233314</guid> <description>Have you read the book? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you read the book?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Miss Carnivorous</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2006/06/18/coulter-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-233313</link> <dc:creator>Miss Carnivorous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 11:38:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2490#comment-233313</guid> <description>Ann is porn for conservatives. We get off on on bashing liberals. It feels good. The problem is that it shouldn&#039;t  be done in public, which is what Ann is doing. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann is porn for conservatives. We get off on on bashing liberals. It feels good. The problem is that it shouldn&#039;t  be done in public, which is what Ann is doing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-22 06:52:08 by W3 Total Cache -->
