<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Harriet, Hurt, and a Huffy.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/10/03/on-harriet-hurt-and-a-huffy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/10/03/on-harriet-hurt-and-a-huffy/</link>
	<description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing Nut House &#187; THE COUNCIL HAS SPOKEN: Politics served up with a smile&#8230; And a stilletto.</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/10/03/on-harriet-hurt-and-a-huffy/comment-page-1/#comment-94768</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing Nut House &#187; THE COUNCIL HAS SPOKEN: Politics served up with a smile&#8230; And a stilletto.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2024#comment-94768</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New World Man - it's got wires that vibrate</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/10/03/on-harriet-hurt-and-a-huffy/comment-page-1/#comment-89287</link>
		<dc:creator>New World Man - it's got wires that vibrate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 00:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2024#comment-89287</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Watcher&#039;s Council best posts week ending October 6&lt;/strong&gt;

The Watcher&#039;s Council selected these best posts from among those nominated for the week ending October 6. Gates of Vienna, on a roll, scored with LGF Spots the Gilded Cage by virtue of a tiebreaker. When you&#039;re on a roll the bounces go your way! My f...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Watcher&#8217;s Council best posts week ending October 6</strong></p>
<p>The Watcher&#8217;s Council selected these best posts from among those nominated for the week ending October 6. Gates of Vienna, on a roll, scored with LGF Spots the Gilded Cage by virtue of a tiebreaker. When you&#8217;re on a roll the bounces go your way! My f&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Education Wonks</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/10/03/on-harriet-hurt-and-a-huffy/comment-page-1/#comment-87215</link>
		<dc:creator>The Education Wonks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 05:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2024#comment-87215</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Watcher&#039;s Council Has Spoken!&lt;/strong&gt;

Each and every week, Watcher of Weasels sponsors a contest to see what are some of the most link-worthy posts from the conservative side of the &#039;Sphere. The winning entries are determined by a jury of 12 writers (and The Watcher) known</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Watcher&#8217;s Council Has Spoken!</strong></p>
<p>Each and every week, Watcher of Weasels sponsors a contest to see what are some of the most link-worthy posts from the conservative side of the &#8216;Sphere. The winning entries are determined by a jury of 12 writers (and The Watcher) known</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Grey - Liberty D</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/10/03/on-harriet-hurt-and-a-huffy/comment-page-1/#comment-87217</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Grey - Liberty D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 03:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2024#comment-87217</guid>
		<description>Was it The Nominee, or The Fight? 
 
In fact, with Roberts perhaps only 80% to actually overturn Roe (who really knows???), I put Miers at 90% to do so.   
 
The &quot;fact&quot; is MY estimate.  There is no &quot;fact&quot; about the future decisions of an SC Justice.  That&#039;s where uncertainty comes in. 
 
We can NOT get the Schwinn until Roe is overturned.  NONE can give it to us in the nomination, unless a Brown or Luttig is willing to go on record in the hearings against Roe, and endure The Fight. 
 
The Gang of 7 (of 14) seem to say Bush &amp; Reps would lose such a fight.  (I want the Fight -- and to Win.)  I &lt;a href=&quot;http://tomgrey.motime.com/1128898139#503183&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blame&lt;/a&gt; the Gang of 7 of 14. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was it The Nominee, or The Fight?</p>
<p>In fact, with Roberts perhaps only 80% to actually overturn Roe (who really knows???), I put Miers at 90% to do so.  </p>
<p>The &quot;fact&quot; is MY estimate.  There is no &quot;fact&quot; about the future decisions of an SC Justice.  That&#039;s where uncertainty comes in.</p>
<p>We can NOT get the Schwinn until Roe is overturned.  NONE can give it to us in the nomination, unless a Brown or Luttig is willing to go on record in the hearings against Roe, and endure The Fight.</p>
<p>The Gang of 7 (of 14) seem to say Bush &amp; Reps would lose such a fight.  (I want the Fight &#8212; and to Win.)  I <a href="http://tomgrey.motime.com/1128898139#503183" rel="nofollow">blame</a> the Gang of 7 of 14.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Glittering Eye</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/10/03/on-harriet-hurt-and-a-huffy/comment-page-1/#comment-86063</link>
		<dc:creator>The Glittering Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 14:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2024#comment-86063</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Council has spoken!&lt;/strong&gt;

	The Watcher&#8217;s Council has announced their selections for the posts of the last week most deserving of recognition.    The winning Council post was Gates of Vienna&#8217;s post on women in Saudi Arabia, &#8220;LGF Spots the Gilded Cage&#8221;.  I...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Council has spoken!</strong></p>
<p>	The Watcher&#8217;s Council has announced their selections for the posts of the last week most deserving of recognition.    The winning Council post was Gates of Vienna&#8217;s post on women in Saudi Arabia, &#8220;LGF Spots the Gilded Cage&#8221;.  I&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strata-Sphere &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Council Has Spoken!</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/10/03/on-harriet-hurt-and-a-huffy/comment-page-1/#comment-86060</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strata-Sphere &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Council Has Spoken!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 13:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2024#comment-86060</guid>
		<description>[...] This week&#8217;s winners in the Watcher&#8217;s Council for best posts have been selected! In the Council Category the best post was LGF Spots the Gilded Cage by Gates of Vienna, while second place went to On Harriet, Hurt, and a Huffy by The Sundries Shack. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This week&#8217;s winners in the Watcher&#8217;s Council for best posts have been selected! In the Council Category the best post was LGF Spots the Gilded Cage by Gates of Vienna, while second place went to On Harriet, Hurt, and a Huffy by The Sundries Shack. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Anchoress &#187; Oh, no!!! Miers GREW over time!</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/10/03/on-harriet-hurt-and-a-huffy/comment-page-1/#comment-85115</link>
		<dc:creator>The Anchoress &#187; Oh, no!!! Miers GREW over time!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2024#comment-85115</guid>
		<description>[...] I give Doug points for anger-induced moxie, but I still think Jimmie Bise gets the prize, because he uses a good analogy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I give Doug points for anger-induced moxie, but I still think Jimmie Bise gets the prize, because he uses a good analogy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feisty</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/10/03/on-harriet-hurt-and-a-huffy/comment-page-1/#comment-84925</link>
		<dc:creator>Feisty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 06:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2024#comment-84925</guid>
		<description>As long as Mrs. Unknown Texas Lawyer-chick upholds the constitution, I am satisfied.  I don&#039;t care about anything else, really. 
 
If she pisses off MoveOn.org, that&#039;s a plus too. 
 
I wish W would have appointed a non-lawyer conservative constitutional scholar or something like that to really tell everyone everywhere the Supreme Court is about deciding constitutional issues. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as Mrs. Unknown Texas Lawyer-chick upholds the constitution, I am satisfied.  I don&#039;t care about anything else, really.</p>
<p>If she pisses off MoveOn.org, that&#039;s a plus too.</p>
<p>I wish W would have appointed a non-lawyer conservative constitutional scholar or something like that to really tell everyone everywhere the Supreme Court is about deciding constitutional issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-02-09 22:02:35 by W3 Total Cache -->
