<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Christmas Comes Early for Bush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/09/14/christmas-comes-early-for-bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/09/14/christmas-comes-early-for-bush/</link>
	<description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaxedOutMama</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/09/14/christmas-comes-early-for-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-75398</link>
		<dc:creator>MaxedOutMama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2010#comment-75398</guid>
		<description>I agree that this is not great timing for the Democrats, but I think the nation as a whole is unlikely to become extraordinarily upset about this. 
 
I expect the Court to rule against the pledge as it stands. 
 
The only way this will become a significant issue is if Bush gets another SC nomination aside from these two. Right now he is replacing two conservatives. If he got a chance to replace a liberal this might become a rallying cry on both sides. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this is not great timing for the Democrats, but I think the nation as a whole is unlikely to become extraordinarily upset about this.</p>
<p>I expect the Court to rule against the pledge as it stands.</p>
<p>The only way this will become a significant issue is if Bush gets another SC nomination aside from these two. Right now he is replacing two conservatives. If he got a chance to replace a liberal this might become a rallying cry on both sides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/09/14/christmas-comes-early-for-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-75396</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 02:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2010#comment-75396</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Federal judge declares Pledge of Allegiance in public schools unconstitutional&lt;/strong&gt;

Reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools was declared unconstitutional today by a federal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Federal judge declares Pledge of Allegiance in public schools unconstitutional</strong></p>
<p>Reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools was declared unconstitutional today by a federal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Franscell</title>
		<link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/09/14/christmas-comes-early-for-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-75395</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Franscell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2010#comment-75395</guid>
		<description>From &lt;a href=&quot;http://underthenews.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://underthenews.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt; ... 
 
A federal judge in California has ruled that reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools is unconstitutional because the pledge&#8217;s reference to &#8220;under God&#8221; violates school children&#8217;s right to be &#8220;free from a coercive requirement to affirm God.&#8221; 
 
OK, it&#039;s California, where a guy with a petition to repeal the suffrage of hamsters could get 10,000 signatures in 30 minutes. It&#039;s ironic that ours is a nation where burning the flag is defended as free speech, but kids saying &quot;under God&quot; should be gagged. But really, is this the most pressing issue before a nation at war, a nation rabbit-punched by a hurricane, and a nation with a big al Qaeda target painted on its back? 
 
On one hand, if God intended to reward us for including him in our daily affirmations before class, He might go a little easier on the hurricanes. I mean, don&#039;t you think that admitting we&#039;re &quot;one nation under God&quot; should invite some tender mercies? 
 
On the other hand, maybe He doesn&#039;t care what we force schoolkids to say out loud, and is more interested in how we conduct ourselves when nobody else is looking. 
 
Who knows? The Lord hasn&#039;t really been keeping up his blog, so we&#039;re not sure what He&#039;s thinking. But I can tell you what I&#039;m thinking: These attention-starved atheists are starting to be as annoying as megawatt televangelists. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://underthenews.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://underthenews.blogspot.com</a> &#8230;</p>
<p>A federal judge in California has ruled that reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools is unconstitutional because the pledge&rsquo;s reference to &ldquo;under God&rdquo; violates school children&rsquo;s right to be &ldquo;free from a coercive requirement to affirm God.&rdquo;</p>
<p>OK, it&#039;s California, where a guy with a petition to repeal the suffrage of hamsters could get 10,000 signatures in 30 minutes. It&#039;s ironic that ours is a nation where burning the flag is defended as free speech, but kids saying &quot;under God&quot; should be gagged. But really, is this the most pressing issue before a nation at war, a nation rabbit-punched by a hurricane, and a nation with a big al Qaeda target painted on its back?</p>
<p>On one hand, if God intended to reward us for including him in our daily affirmations before class, He might go a little easier on the hurricanes. I mean, don&#039;t you think that admitting we&#039;re &quot;one nation under God&quot; should invite some tender mercies?</p>
<p>On the other hand, maybe He doesn&#039;t care what we force schoolkids to say out loud, and is more interested in how we conduct ourselves when nobody else is looking.</p>
<p>Who knows? The Lord hasn&#039;t really been keeping up his blog, so we&#039;re not sure what He&#039;s thinking. But I can tell you what I&#039;m thinking: These attention-starved atheists are starting to be as annoying as megawatt televangelists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-02-09 21:28:55 by W3 Total Cache -->
