<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Christmas Comes Early for Bush</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/09/14/christmas-comes-early-for-bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/09/14/christmas-comes-early-for-bush/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 14:27:23 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: MaxedOutMama</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/09/14/christmas-comes-early-for-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-75398</link> <dc:creator>MaxedOutMama</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:08:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2010#comment-75398</guid> <description>I agree that this is not great timing for the Democrats, but I think the nation as a whole is unlikely to become extraordinarily upset about this.
I expect the Court to rule against the pledge as it stands.
The only way this will become a significant issue is if Bush gets another SC nomination aside from these two. Right now he is replacing two conservatives. If he got a chance to replace a liberal this might become a rallying cry on both sides. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this is not great timing for the Democrats, but I think the nation as a whole is unlikely to become extraordinarily upset about this.</p><p>I expect the Court to rule against the pledge as it stands.</p><p>The only way this will become a significant issue is if Bush gets another SC nomination aside from these two. Right now he is replacing two conservatives. If he got a chance to replace a liberal this might become a rallying cry on both sides.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/09/14/christmas-comes-early-for-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-75396</link> <dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 02:31:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2010#comment-75396</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Federal judge declares Pledge of Allegiance in public schools unconstitutional&lt;/strong&gt;Reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools was declared unconstitutional today by a federal</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Federal judge declares Pledge of Allegiance in public schools unconstitutional</strong></p><p>Reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools was declared unconstitutional today by a federal</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ron Franscell</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/09/14/christmas-comes-early-for-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-75395</link> <dc:creator>Ron Franscell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:11:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sundriesshack.com/?p=2010#comment-75395</guid> <description>From &lt;a href=&quot;http://underthenews.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://underthenews.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt; ...
A federal judge in California has ruled that reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools is unconstitutional because the pledge&#8217;s reference to &#8220;under God&#8221; violates school children&#8217;s right to be &#8220;free from a coercive requirement to affirm God.&#8221;
OK, it&#039;s California, where a guy with a petition to repeal the suffrage of hamsters could get 10,000 signatures in 30 minutes. It&#039;s ironic that ours is a nation where burning the flag is defended as free speech, but kids saying &quot;under God&quot; should be gagged. But really, is this the most pressing issue before a nation at war, a nation rabbit-punched by a hurricane, and a nation with a big al Qaeda target painted on its back?
On one hand, if God intended to reward us for including him in our daily affirmations before class, He might go a little easier on the hurricanes. I mean, don&#039;t you think that admitting we&#039;re &quot;one nation under God&quot; should invite some tender mercies?
On the other hand, maybe He doesn&#039;t care what we force schoolkids to say out loud, and is more interested in how we conduct ourselves when nobody else is looking.
Who knows? The Lord hasn&#039;t really been keeping up his blog, so we&#039;re not sure what He&#039;s thinking. But I can tell you what I&#039;m thinking: These attention-starved atheists are starting to be as annoying as megawatt televangelists. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a
href="http://underthenews.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://underthenews.blogspot.com</a> &#8230;</p><p>A federal judge in California has ruled that reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools is unconstitutional because the pledge&rsquo;s reference to &ldquo;under God&rdquo; violates school children&rsquo;s right to be &ldquo;free from a coercive requirement to affirm God.&rdquo;</p><p>OK, it&#039;s California, where a guy with a petition to repeal the suffrage of hamsters could get 10,000 signatures in 30 minutes. It&#039;s ironic that ours is a nation where burning the flag is defended as free speech, but kids saying &quot;under God&quot; should be gagged. But really, is this the most pressing issue before a nation at war, a nation rabbit-punched by a hurricane, and a nation with a big al Qaeda target painted on its back?</p><p>On one hand, if God intended to reward us for including him in our daily affirmations before class, He might go a little easier on the hurricanes. I mean, don&#039;t you think that admitting we&#039;re &quot;one nation under God&quot; should invite some tender mercies?</p><p>On the other hand, maybe He doesn&#039;t care what we force schoolkids to say out loud, and is more interested in how we conduct ourselves when nobody else is looking.</p><p>Who knows? The Lord hasn&#039;t really been keeping up his blog, so we&#039;re not sure what He&#039;s thinking. But I can tell you what I&#039;m thinking: These attention-starved atheists are starting to be as annoying as megawatt televangelists.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-21 04:51:43 by W3 Total Cache -->
