Comments on: So, State was Ringing the Bell on bin Laden? http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/08/17/so-state-was-ringing-the-bell-on-bin-laden/ Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004. Mon, 14 May 2012 14:27:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregatorhttp://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/08/17/so-state-was-ringing-the-bell-on-bin-laden/comment-page-1/#comment-64732 Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator Wed, 17 Aug 2005 20:53:45 +0000 http://sundriesshack.com/?p=1966#comment-64732 <strong>Warning of bin Laden made in ’96</strong>WASHINGTON — State Department analysts warned the Clinton administration in July 1996 that Osa Warning of bin Laden made in ’96

WASHINGTON — State Department analysts warned the Clinton administration in July 1996 that Osa

]]> By: A Dusty Lifehttp://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/08/17/so-state-was-ringing-the-bell-on-bin-laden/comment-page-1/#comment-64599 A Dusty Life Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:45:14 +0000 http://sundriesshack.com/?p=1966#comment-64599 <strong>NYT: State Warned Clinton In '96 To Stop Bin Laden</strong>Today, the New York Times has a story about some State Department documents uncovered by Judicial Watch, that shows President Clinton was warned to stop Osama bin Laden from moving to Afghanistan: State Department analysts warned the Clinton administra... NYT: State Warned Clinton In ’96 To Stop Bin Laden

Today, the New York Times has a story about some State Department documents uncovered by Judicial Watch, that shows President Clinton was warned to stop Osama bin Laden from moving to Afghanistan: State Department analysts warned the Clinton administra…

]]> By: Doughttp://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/08/17/so-state-was-ringing-the-bell-on-bin-laden/comment-page-1/#comment-64600 Doug Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:52:54 +0000 http://sundriesshack.com/?p=1966#comment-64600 I would support another subpoena list. It would be nice to know why this new information was left out. Also if you visit the Judicial Watch website, you can view the actual uncovered documents: pretty cool. I would support another subpoena list. It would be nice to know why this new information was left out. Also if you visit the Judicial Watch website, you can view the actual uncovered documents: pretty cool.

]]>