Amazing column by the Wahington Times about the “witch-hunting” organized by the New York Times against the judge John Roberts, nominated by President Bush to substitute Sandra O’Connor at the Supreme Court. It’s worth remembering that without the …

"One of the things I don't understand about the Roberts is why did they have to go to South America to adopt white children? "

If I registered there (which I wouldn't) I'd be able to reply

"Because of the abortion policies you support, you idiot!"

/sarcasm

Come on, man. Show us some more of the class that’s earned your guys so many election victories, huh?

Why don’t you get a damp cloth and have a lie-down before you contract a bad case of the vapors, you delicate thing you.

Cheers,

Victoria

Your Party just got burnt badly in the Presidential Elections. Badly. This after throwing everything but the kitchen bidet at the President with your Rathergates, your Fahrenheit 9/11's, your Moveon.orgs, Hollywood muscle, everything.

What you were selling, the American people weren't buying.

So what happens the year after? Instead of re-tooling yourselves, analysing why that might've been, and possibly mending your ways to present yourselves as viable options again, you've:

1- Elected Dr. Howard Dean as DNC Chair, thus making you look even more pathetic, out-of-control and out-of-touch than ever.

2- Are going hammer and tongs after trivialities like the President's holidays and John Roberts' children's adoption papers, when blowing smoke up the wazoo about Rove didn't work.

3- Being shills for murdering terrorists every time terror attacks come up. Granted, even Democrats wouldn't attack the US as a George Galloway, my compatriot, does, but then you actually have to live here.

And I don't see this changing any time soon.

Instead of offering a cogent, responsible opposition to the Presidency, those of your political ilk are content to use playground tactics which will only make the Electorate think you're a bunch of snotty adolescents ill-fit to run the country.

You thin you have ideals? You have the ideals of alleyway tomcats. You lack professionalism and probity, and only the very young, the very lost, the very pathetic want to be run by people who share your political inclinations.

And I don't see this changing any time soon.

In fact, you will probably select Senator Clinton as your Democratic Party nominee in 2008, and have your patootie handed to you.

(And I say patootie, in case your soccer-playing children are reading this. We wouldn't want to set a bad example, now would we. COME ON YOU SPURS!)

Have fun in what I believe are called, "The Wilderness Years".

Cheers,

Victoria