Comments on: No War, But Some Assault is Okay.

By: Comic Book Guy

Comic Book Guy — Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:38:45 +0000

Wimpiest warmongers, ever! LOL!

By: Jimmie

Jimmie — Sat, 22 Jan 2005 10:09:49 +0000

Yeah, that PATRIOT Act. I wondered when that would come up. So how is it that this law which apparently takes away so many people's rights and has turned us into an oppressive fascist dictatorship has managed to spawn such public protests. More specifically, how is it that these people who claim to be oppressed by a fascist thug can manage to protest out in public where everyone can hear and see them, and get their faces on the news broadcasts? Better yet, how can these protestors manage to assault someone within a few dozen feet of some police officers and not go immediately to jail?

Seems this PATRIOT Act isn't doing all the oppressing that these "anarchists" say it is.

But can you, or any of these "anarchists" point to any right that the PATRIOT Act has taken away from any American citizen? Just one, with documentation?

By: Sara

Sara — Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:48:01 +0000

Sara, it’s odd how these “anarchists” never seem to show up at Democratic functions. I would expect that, given the definition of which I’m pretty aware, anarchists would protest any political gathering.

We get plenty of anarchists that show up and cause problems. But generally speaking, the actions of Bush are more likely to trigger anarchist revolt. Namely the Patriot act.

By: LCVRWC

LCVRWC — Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:50:45 +0000

Hmmm. One thing that caught my eye was the Post calling the PW signs "pro-war." No liberal bias here, no sir.

By: Flopping Aces

Flopping Aces — Fri, 21 Jan 2005 03:29:52 +0000

Inauguration Day
The inauguration went off without a hitch and man was that speech something. Great speach and probably one of the greatest deliveries Bush has made during a speech.

By: Jimmie

Jimmie — Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:52:16 +0000

Sara, it's odd how these "anarchists" never seem to show up at Democratic functions. I would expect that, given the definition of which I'm pretty aware, anarchists would protest any political gathering.

But no. Of course not.

By: Curt

Curt — Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:30:30 +0000

And woops, meant to say he said not she said…sorry

By: Curt

Curt — Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:28:23 +0000

she never stated they were democrats or liberals, she said anti-war protestors. kinda funny why a group that holds all government as unnecessary would only protest republican functions tho huh? democrats are government also. idiots.