<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Caution! This Computer is Not Edible!</title> <atom:link href="http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/01/12/caution-this-computer-is-not-edible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/01/12/caution-this-computer-is-not-edible/</link> <description>Delivering the Best of the New Media Since 2004.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 14:27:23 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/01/12/caution-this-computer-is-not-edible/comment-page-1/#comment-2652</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:03:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">/?p=1345#comment-2652</guid> <description>My own metric on whether a new OS is worth my time is whether it gives me a signifant advantage for the cost - no matter the system on which it runs. That&#039;s the reason I haven&#039;t seriously looked at a Mac - because the advantage it will give me isn&#039;t worth the financial hit I&#039;d end up taking. It&#039;s also why I&#039;ve only fiddled with Linux - any advantage I might get from it would get sucked up (plus some) in time I&#039;d have to spend setting it up and fiddling with it.
That said, I&#039;ve thought for a long time that if I were to splurge on a computer, I&#039;d splurge on a Mac. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My own metric on whether a new OS is worth my time is whether it gives me a signifant advantage for the cost &#8211; no matter the system on which it runs. That&#039;s the reason I haven&#039;t seriously looked at a Mac &#8211; because the advantage it will give me isn&#039;t worth the financial hit I&#039;d end up taking. It&#039;s also why I&#039;ve only fiddled with Linux &#8211; any advantage I might get from it would get sucked up (plus some) in time I&#039;d have to spend setting it up and fiddling with it.</p><p>That said, I&#039;ve thought for a long time that if I were to splurge on a computer, I&#039;d splurge on a Mac.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EricH</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/01/12/caution-this-computer-is-not-edible/comment-page-1/#comment-2651</link> <dc:creator>EricH</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:37:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">/?p=1345#comment-2651</guid> <description>If, as you say, you have no basis for comparison, you would have to be underwhelmed by any new computer, wouldn&#039;t you?
You&#039;re right, the Mac OS doesn&#039;t offer a huge kick-up in the computer&#039;s performance, and isn&#039;t designed to--the point is to increase &lt;i&gt;your&lt;/i&gt; performance. You can always disagree about whether it does that for you personally, though the studies show that people generally work more efficiently on Macs than PCs, if they&#039;re equally familiar. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If, as you say, you have no basis for comparison, you would have to be underwhelmed by any new computer, wouldn&#039;t you?</p><p>You&#039;re right, the Mac OS doesn&#039;t offer a huge kick-up in the computer&#039;s performance, and isn&#039;t designed to&#8211;the point is to increase <i>your</i> performance. You can always disagree about whether it does that for you personally, though the studies show that people generally work more efficiently on Macs than PCs, if they&#039;re equally familiar.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/01/12/caution-this-computer-is-not-edible/comment-page-1/#comment-2647</link> <dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:22:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">/?p=1345#comment-2647</guid> <description>marc, you shuold put out a Mac recipe book. Mmmm....mac and cheese. ;)
Robbie...I don&#039;t want to start a whole flapdoodle about OSX but, to be honest, if an OS runs my computer and stays out of my way, then I (just as a user) consider it comparable with every other OS that runs my computer and stays out of my way. UNless there&#039;s a huge kick-up in performance out of a new OS, then it&#039;s just the same as an old one. That&#039;s kind of why I&#039;m not quite on the OSX bandwagon. I&#039;m sure it&#039;s neat but I, as an average mook, and not quite sure why it&#039;s better than the pretty cheap version of Win98b running on my PC right now. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marc, you shuold put out a Mac recipe book. Mmmm&#8230;.mac and cheese. <img
src='http://www.sundriesshack.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Robbie&#8230;I don&#039;t want to start a whole flapdoodle about OSX but, to be honest, if an OS runs my computer and stays out of my way, then I (just as a user) consider it comparable with every other OS that runs my computer and stays out of my way. UNless there&#039;s a huge kick-up in performance out of a new OS, then it&#039;s just the same as an old one. That&#039;s kind of why I&#039;m not quite on the OSX bandwagon. I&#039;m sure it&#039;s neat but I, as an average mook, and not quite sure why it&#039;s better than the pretty cheap version of Win98b running on my PC right now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robbie</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/01/12/caution-this-computer-is-not-edible/comment-page-1/#comment-2645</link> <dc:creator>Robbie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:15:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">/?p=1345#comment-2645</guid> <description>The mini-Mac is PC equiptment compatible. So someone like you, who has monitor, keyboard and mouse already, can just plug-and-play. Besides, Windows won&#039;t have anything &quot;comparable&quot; with OSX until Longhorn comes out ... whenever that is. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mini-Mac is PC equiptment compatible. So someone like you, who has monitor, keyboard and mouse already, can just plug-and-play. Besides, Windows won&#039;t have anything &quot;comparable&quot; with OSX until Longhorn comes out &#8230; whenever that is.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: marc</title><link>http://www.sundriesshack.com/2005/01/12/caution-this-computer-is-not-edible/comment-page-1/#comment-2644</link> <dc:creator>marc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:31:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">/?p=1345#comment-2644</guid> <description>Actually, I usually put it in a double boiler and make a nice sauce.  Very smooth.
And it&#039;s a G4. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I usually put it in a double boiler and make a nice sauce.  Very smooth.</p><p>And it&#039;s a G4.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.sundriesshack.com @ 2012-05-16 12:47:54 by W3 Total Cache -->
